240 vs 144hz reddit

240 vs 144hz reddit

16666667 ms) vs the 175Hz scenario (5. 7ms between frames, so of course the law or diminishing returns applies. Good answer. Pixel density does not affect how it feels, only how it looks. would it make sense to upgrade to 144hz if i’m pushing around 110-120 fps max. I will probably get a 4k 144hz later on for future uses once I upgrade my gpu again. Thus, looking at it this way, a 1440p monitor should costs more expensive than a 1080p one. Many people struggle noticing a difference and it is up to Snapping on to the place where your target will be becomes a lot easier with a 240hz monitor as opposed to 120/144hz. 240 is an upgrade from 140 and you will notice, pushing to 300 is not worth the price, imo I've changed from 144hz to 240 at 1080p and is noticable You notice more from 60 to 144, but you do still notice it. there are two aspects of high refresh rate gaming, input-to-display lag and pixel response time. As far as I know, a 240Hz LCD takes 4. it s time for 1440@240hz, hope we ll get soon 1440@360 and 4k@240hz and 1080 gets obsolete. ) The jump is less noticeable than from 60 to 144hz but it should still make a difference. going from 60hz to 144hz offers a 9. Freesync and g-sync compatible monitors have very fluctuating results on 20-series and 30-series, and depends greatly on game and drivers. Hard disagree. Going from a 60hz to a 120/144hz monitor, your eyes notice the difference big time. If your currently using 60hz the jump to 60hz to 240hz is a much bigger difference than the jump from 60hz to 144hz. At 240Hz, frametime is 4. Get the 4k monitor. So I've been in the market for a new monitor. 39ms from 240Hz to 360Hz. 60Hz has (1000/60=) about 17ms, 144Hz has (1000/144=) about 7ms, 240Hz has (1000/240=) about 5ms. Typically, you’ll be luckily to get 144fps in most new (labeled ‘next gen’) games with a GTX 1070 at 1440p. If it wouldnt be worth it I'd use that money towards something else but if the 240hz would really help give an advantage of some sort I could see it be worth it I'm 2160x1440 240hz vs 4k 144hz. However hitting above 144fps-240fps, 240hz>144hz. I'd rather not stretch my budget all the way up to $500 for the full 240hz + DyAc experience, but I'm trying to figure out which of these two 240 Hz at 1080p is nice if you are a competitive FPS gamer and whatnot but otherwise 144hz at 1440p is a nicer experience. To specifically answer your question about 60 Hz, I did two more sets. Personally I wouldn’t buy anything above 280hz. 9ms, a reduction of 9,8ms over 60FPS. Unless we are talking about bigger resolutions. It has the lowest motion blur, lowest input latency, fastest pixel response times, best motion blur reducing backlight strobing, and highest refresh rate in the 1440p category. Just the intro map animations were immediately eyebrow raising without even getting into the map yet. You go from 4ms to 2. Once you cross 120 Hz it gets harder and harder to tell. Cheers. So would it be better to buy a 4090 now or wait until the 4080 is released in November even though benchmarks show the 4090 is much better than the 4080? I might consider an upgrade to a 32 inch 4K 144Hz monitor in the future which pushes me more toward the 4090. In my opinion it’s not worth it to upgrade unless you play games at a highly competitive level and genuinely need the most current frames possible. There are many IPS monitors with 1ms response time. 120-240 isn't as big of a deal as 60-120. 1/120 = 8ms. 66 ms) is actually bigger than the difference you'll get going from 144hz to 165 (0. Therefore, while a 3090 won’t get me 4K at 144fps for the latest and biggest games, I can achieve it as well as 1440p at 240fps for the majority of games I play. I think those are more important. I feel like it would be a waste going for 360hz. At 60Hz the frametime is 16. But on Rocket League I have tried both capping to 144 fps and 240 fps and somehow it is way smoother when I cap it at 240, which is odd because The difference between 165 and 240 is not big. If you're someone who plays games only casually, you really don't need more than 144hz. AFAIK, the difference is in input lag. Thing is the 240hz is cheaper through Kogan while the 144hz model is an extra $100 if bought brand new. There is also a very small reduction in latency but that on the other hand won't be perceptible. so just get 144hz and then 240hz if you have money. The 240hz is only achievable on less demanding titles without an insane rig, and even then, 144hz only looks slightly less buttery. 13. 33ms. At 75Hz, frametime is 13. I think I agree the most with what Smooya said, if you spend a lot of time doing something you are definitely going to reap the benefits of investing more money into making it a more pleasurable experience. Therefore, on paper, assuming all else is equal, going from 60 Hz to 165 Hz should result in roughly ~10 ms improvement. 360hz monitors are super expensive so I would just get a 240hz one and get megahack v7. Besides, according to BlurBusters, it is greatly beneficial for backlight strobing at lower refresh rates Speaking of, there's a lot of no brand models out there but their build quality is questionable. Similarly the jump from 60 to 144 (9. IPS panel, Great colors, great response times compared to other 144 hz monitors priced at around and above this range. This is the difference between 1000Hz and 8000Hz on a 360Hz monitor. Here is a slider comparison. 72) is far bigger than 144 to 240 (2. The difference between 60hz and 144hz is huge, whereas 240 to 144hz is less. Unless you pretty much do competitive shooters exclusively get the 144hz 1440p. Its really input lag that will differ. The difference between 144Hz and 240Hz is infinitesimal. Went from 144hz to 240hz. bn25168. NegativeChristian. I have a 1440p 165hz on my desktop and a 240hz 1080p on my laptop. 167 ms per frame. The Samsung odyssey g7 (last gen) gas 2k 240hz as well and competes well with the alienware. With a g-sync module, everything just works. Samsung Odyssey Neo G8 - 2160p 240hz. might as well get any extra FPS over 60 that you can. 1. Plus 1080p on a 1440p monitor looks even worse than just a normal 1080p monitor. For every one refresh of the 60hz monitor, the 240hz refreshes 4 times. IMO anything over 144hz is overkill unless you’re playing competitive FPS but since we’re both playing cyber 2077, I highly recommend 4K 144hz over 1440p 240hz. 1080p gaming needs to die already in the high end. Main games I play are CS2, RL, Fortnite & GTA. Getting a high refresh rate monitor is super worth it though imo. 120hz 55" 4k oled tv motion does feel worse than 27" 144hz, mostly due to pixel density lacking. 240 Hz is 500 nits Vs 300 nits brightness on the 165 Hz screen but for $120 difference, I'd stick with the 165 Hz one. I'm unsure if I should go for better resolution or refresh rate. Looking forward to seeing what y’all think! :) Edit: I’m currently eyeing the Alienware AW2721D for 1440p 240Hz and the LG 27GN950 for 4K 144Hz. 4k 120hz. PG279QM, because it has a built in g-sync module. The games I play are COD, Valorant, palworld, ark, and other rpg's. I've been looking into a couple monitors to upgrade the one I'm currently using, which is 1440p 170hz. 1 million pixels) so there’s less strain on my game. 144hz VS 240hz. 144hz 1440p is the sweet spot for most people. Over the years ive owned/used 60hz, then 144hz, then 240hz and now a 390hz. And regarding the difference of 144hz and 240hz, i know someone may think the difference is not big, i think that is always by comparison: since the difference between 144hz-->240hz is not such big as 60hz --> 144hz, but that is also one thing sure is: 144hz --> 240hz is bigger than 240hz --> 360hz :D. Reply reply. 3ms on the IPS is actually somewhat achievable, most brag about 1ms, but it's marketing hype (one color on the highest refresh OC will hit 1ms is how they usually sell it). Even my former 15 in 144hz 1080p craps out over 100 Hz. For fast action games I'd go for refresh rate over resolution. 88 ms). 240 Hz. As for 4K 144hz, you may have to aim for a 3090 or whatever AMD is offering that is better depending on benchmarks to maintain 120+ FPS. 06 ms/frame. The difference from 144-240 is small. 94 ms/frame. Only if you are 100% set on competitive side - get 360hz. In need of a new monitor but not keen to dish out a shit load on one so I have two monitors in mind, both are basically the same models but ones 240hz whilst the other is 144hz. noticeably better response-time vs noticeably smoother with Asus PG24 vs MSI Mag25. 14. The difference between 240hz and 144hz is motion clarity. The difference between 240-360 is negligible. 1440hz, you wont notice any difference between 120 and 144 anyway, 240hz is pure waste of money. The difference between 144 and 240 is not too noticeable, but get 240hz if you're super serious about getting good at a game. For instance, the Acer XV271U M3 goes for $200, while the cheapest 1440p 240Hz model is the HP Omen 27qs at ~$350. A counterargument would be stability. Additionally a jump from 60-120hz refresh rate is a more noticeable difference than going from 240-360, which is because you're going from a 100% increase to a 50%. Im so torn on what to do. Because on this video 144 hz looks indeed super jumpy and I don't think anyone could call it that way in real life (i mean even if you have the best eyes, I don't think 144 fps on 144hz monitorst can look jumpy, let alone super jumpy) If that's the case then this reason is just wrong because after slowing the video more and including Go for 144hz 1440p if you use it also for work. At 240 Hz, this is 4. The jump from 60hz to 144hz felt immensily higher than from 144hz to 240hz, to give a reference. No I would have both I currently have 2 - 1440p 144hz monitors and only REALLY make use of one so was going to sell the other to a friend and use that money towards a 1080p 240hz. 144hz is a frame time of just under 7ms. You don't even need a game, just drag any window around on your screen and compare it to a higher hz setting and you immidietly see the difference. I’m not an expert by any means, but I play 16:10 on a 1440p 144 hz. In my opinion 144 hz is hard to tell from 240 hz assuming the fps is high on both. However I seen lg came out with the 27 in 1440p 240hz OLED and I keep hearing nothing but good about OLED minus burn in which isn’t a problem with all of them. 2ms, less than 3ms reduction over 144Hz. 1/60 = 16ms. Promise you getting 240 is worth it. So, purchasing a 1440p monitor with 144Hz is strongly advised if you have more money. Settling for a 1440p 144hz would probably suit me best. 144 Hz = 6. Yeah- if you think of it this way: 240 hz is a frame time of just over 4 ms. You can't really measure the hz of the eye as they work kind of interrupt based. 60hz to 144hz is a 140% increase in refresh rate. 1440p 144Hz. The best settings are always the highest you can get with your specs. Go to settings, click system, display, Advanced display settings, Display adapter properties for <display name, probably called display 1>, go to the monitor tab You will notice a greater difference from 60 hz to 144 than 144 to 240, but you will need to be having consistent fps above 240 to properly utilize it. 71428571 ms) . Snapping on to the place where your target will be becomes a lot easier with a 240hz monitor as opposed to 120/144hz. Not worth it at all, 240 is about as high as you would ever need and even that has varying opinions and depends on the circumstance. Best combos of performance and value. You'll notice a difference but it won't be big enough to Running games on these monitors even with a 4080 is very difficult to even achieve 120fps. Also depends on the rig. Assuming your PC can pump out the FPS, a 144hz monitor made the most noticeable visual impact on my Overwatch enjoyment. 144hz monitor with 288fps bypass and 240hz with 360fps bypass are both good choices for high level play. visibility on 1440p is a lot better imo, and the only maps you’re hitting >144hz on are prob labs and factory. 3 Best 1080p 240Hz Gaming Monitor – Samsung 27-Inch CRG5. 76 ms improvement. If you want a 240hz monitor he recommends the Viewsonic Omni XG2431 24 inch. Also you can very well tell the difference between 60hz and 120/144hz. Cant decide if I want to go with 1440p 240hz or the 144hz 1440p. 120hz to 144hz is a 20% increase in refresh rate. One thing I wanted to touch on was the 240hz refresh rate monitors. My resolution I set similar to 1080p in pixel count (2. 73 ms improvement between frames. A 144hz monitor shaves it down to 7ms which is why the difference is extremely noticeable while playing. CMVTHATSME1. However, I heard these 240 are IPS like, so they look amazing and even some Standalone monitors are still 240hz TN. 144Hz (27GL850) was that the 240Hz monitor was better but that might be due to better response times since it seemed faster even at similar refresh rates and it didn't seem better at refresh rates above 180Hz which was probably was the best that its response time could do. In a 240Hz scenario this all happens in 240th of a second (4. if the price difference doesnt bother you, get 240hz, otherwise get 144, 240 isnt gonna give you much advantage, its just gonna feel nicer. A 240hz monitor is definitely a waste of money. Some games even have a FPS cap, for instance the newest Assasin’s Creed Origins has a cap at 90 FPS and BF4 has a FPS cap built in of 200FPS. 39 ms improvement. But going from that to 240hz, it becomes less of a noticeable effect on your eyes and more so of a Yes! I went from 60 to 144, then 144 to 240. It feels worse because the refresh rate is lower, but mostly because tvs generally have really bad input lag compared to monitors, even at the same refresh rate. A different take on monitor refresh rates (and the actual fact why 60hz to 144hz is the biggest jump and 144hz to 240hz not so much) 144hz. 1 Best Enthusiast 1440p 144Hz Gaming Monitor – Asus ROG Strix XG279Q. The perceivable difference between 144hz and 240hz is minimal. Also since going to 1440p, my car feels bigger and I'm able to dribble more consistently. This was recently covered on a post on this sub, linked here. But when I limited the FPS to 165 manually in the game settings halfway through a match, I actually noticed it felt a bit less fluid. 5 1440 144Hz & 1080p 240Hz Recommendations. You might not get 144 fps, but you will get above 60 in most games. Obviously the more frames you can display the better. That's the noticeable element of higher polling rates. The difference honestly isn't big and most people would have a hard time telling the screens apart. I only play Tf2 and the difference between 144hz and 240hz is very noticable. 5. even if you can't hit 120 (there isn't a card on the market that is running GTA 5 at 120 on ultra or high settings) you eventually might. 9ms. This way, it is very apparent that 60 to 144 is a very big change, but 144 to 240 is not as much. Meanwhile, going from 165 hz to 240 Hz should result in roughly ~2 ms improvement. The monitors being compared are: Asus ROG Swift 360Hz PG27AQN - 1440p 360hz. also, I run a 1440p 144hz monitor and it looks great at desk distance. Most of the monitors I have seen are either high refresh rate or 1440p and not a lot do both. if you play other comp shooters like cs/val, ow, r6, or apex, 240hz might be worth it. 1/144 = 6. 144hz to 240hz is a 67% increase in refresh rate. The number alone may lead you to believe it is, but what's important here is frametime, that is how long it takes between each refresh. 240hz OLED: Blurriest but has zero artifacts / image quality issues. It's usually better to lower some settings to get higher FPS, if needed. 2 ms (1000 * 1/240) to scanout the image. 1440p 144hz here and it is amazing. Apr 12, 2021 · 4 Verdict. It has a much better contrast ratio due to being a VA panel, and because this was Samsung's flagship monitor, the usual drawbacks to VA panels are non existent Best 1440p monitor for high fps gaming currently is the Acer predator xb273u gx which is a 1440p 270hz ips lcd monitor. I can tell the difference between 240 and 120, but it's much more subtle and not nearly as significant as jumping from 60 to 120. I arleady know that from 60hz to 144hz 144hz monitor: 144 fps vs 240 fps cap difference. Going up to 120Hz, frametime is cut all the way down to 8. From what ive seen so far, the 144/165hz one will cost me around 300-350€ while the 240hz one costs are around 500€. This is less noticable in games this test is designed to make these things more noticable. But if you are a hardcore gamer, then for for 240hz 1080p, because you probably want more refresh rate for better aiming at fps games. It will also be a lot less work on your rig if you cap it a little over 240. I currently use a 24" 1080p 144hz monitor and I'm looking at upgrading my second display. 1ms. And will the battery last longer because of the lower refresh rate and the less graphics usage? Yes, battery life is affected by refresh rate, and yes you can change it in Windows. 240Hz = 1/240s = 4. 2. The jump from 144Hz to 240Hz is a minor one for all but those at the very top skill-wise. 240 to 360 hz offers a 1. 144 Hz = 1/144s = 6. Overclocked 180hz not reliable imo. 360hz DyAc+: Clearest but has crosstalk (where you see the image twice kind of like ghosting. Some people can tell the difference and others cant. Decisions, decisions. I'd argue that your experience will feel less consistent on a 240hz unlocked since depending on the scenerio you will suddenly feel dips in smoothness while at 144hz you won't feel the dip from 220-150 nearly as much. 144 to 240 isn't that big that you feel like you're missing out, unlike 60 to 144hz. 240 Hz = 4. That being said, if you're not bothered playing competetive games going with the 240hz is definitely not worth it. Best bang for the buck right now, unless the AOC 24G2 is in stock 1440p 144hz » Acer Nitro for budget, LG27GP850-B or Asus VG27AQ for mid range - IPS, Reddit favorite monitors. 144hz is sweet spot for any game. I'd probably look more on the panel used instead of getting the higher refresh rate. I'd imagine the difference to be even bigger in games like Counter Strike. My question im stuck on now is if i should get a 1440p 144/165hz or a 1440p 240hz Monitor. If you chasing that edge i recommend 240hz benq. 66ms. Higher the refresh rate quicker the frame you get to see on screen ends up being presented. . In increments of 20-40 beyond 120 you're not going to notice much, but if you jump 100 you're definitely going to notice. 2 Best All-Rounder 1440p 144Hz Gaming Monitor – BenQ EX2780Q. 240hz is more smooth, for sure, but the difference is not as big as 60hz-165hz. 60 Hz = 1/60s = 16. For 17 in and below I am fine with 1440p60 as a matter of cost. Go 240hz with a 27”. On the other hand, the jump from 1080p to 1440p is more impactful. For comparison: after playing couple of months with 240hz benq i switched to 144hz 1440p and it didnt bother me. My pc can’t hit 240FPS on anything even if 1440p 240hz vs 1080p 360hz. At 144Hz, frametime is 6. You'll appreciate the higher resolution pretty much everywhere else. The difference is much smaller than from 60 to 144. 24in 1080p 144hz - » LG 24GN650-B - IPS, fast response time, 144hz, HDR10. What's your setup, you going to need a really good cpu to reach 240 at 1080 most of the time compared to more of a balanced build for 144 1440p. I currently have a 3080 10GB and was looking for an upgrade at my 3080 does struggle even at 1440p in the more demanding games. 1440p is great outside rocket league too unlike 1080p which is meh. 16ms. Need insight if its worth going to a 144hz or the 240 hz in 1440p. Picked up the LG 32GQ850-B recently and it can scale to 4k as well. 16 ms/frame. It’s a smooth experience and while the difference is not as noticeable from 60->144, it’s there and it makes everything look so much better. 74). Not a super significant difference in frame times, but definitely still looks smoother. The upcoming Eve Spectrum looks Having owned both, the resolution boost from 1080p to 1440p is substantial. for most 240hz is only really noticeable if you go back to 144hz and until then it just feels like 144hz. 6 Related. Valorant isn’t a hard game to run so you might be good, but do some FPS benchmarks first to determine what’s best for your setup. Not by way of human perception, though. So you can see that going from 60Hz to 144Hz is a massive difference that can be seen and felt by most people, while 144Hz to 240Hz is a tiny difference Mighty_McBosh. So. Ultrawide 1440p 144hz Joji_Narushima. A 240hz monitor reduces it to 4 ms hence the jump to 240 isn't as pronounced since our ability to perceive increased frames reduces at such low time intervals and the absolute difference is reduced. Rather than refresh rate and resolution, I would think about the panel and the color accuracy and whatnot. If your display refreshes 60 times per second it can't change pixels faster than 16ms between frames. 1/240 = 4. Everything just looks so smooth at 120/144. Alienware AW2523HF 360hz $299. AMA Premium. Not to mention you’ll naturally sit a little further back with 27” so the resolution will look close to 1440p@24” if you were to sit close. 240hz gives just slight edge. 1440p 144hz and save a buck while being able to drive it for more years. I get usually 140-160 fps, but back when I used to max out my Graphics settings I was getting 90fps and the game still looked worlds better than "90fps" on my 60hz monitor. Contrast is ok. I personally don’t use a 360, but it is important to note that the more fps/hz you have the less noticeable upgrades can be. So considering both displays are equal in After reading a lot of reviews and comparisons, I had just about decided on the BenQ XL2540 240hz monitor, but then I noticed that for only a few dollars less I could get the XL2536 (144hz + BenQ DyAc). 73ms, but that number decreases to 2. 165 Hz = 6. Reply. I got a 3070 with 1080p 144hz and was thinking of going 1440p 144hz. That's literally what 60hz means. Theres also the BenQ XL2540k which, in comparison to the XL2546k, doesnt have “DyAc” or The difference from 60 hz to 144 is way more noticeable than 144 to 240. 1/165 = 6ms. So I have a 7800x3d and 7900xt and I have the gigabyte m28u which is a good monitor. Ive heard the XL2546k is the best gaming monitor right now for Fortnite, so im wondering if it is worth the price over this 360hz monitor even though it is still 240hz. 240Hz -> 360Hz is literally just if you are an absolute baller or a pro player (with that said plenty of pros still just play 240Hz anyway). Considering that 1440p 240Hz also requires a beefier GPU, we only recommend it for those with powerful PC rigs. Pixel density will still be better than 24” at 1080p, but not high enough to really slow down your FPS. The jump from 144 Hz to 240 Hz was immediately noticeable for me in Quake Champions without trying at all. Since you only play valorant and very seriously, get a 240hz. I’d say 4k 144hz because you might not always be able to reach 240hz which will cause it to feel clunky when the fps is changing. 80% of my game time is with shooters like Valorant, CSGO, Overwatch, and Apex, so the 360hz is noticeably smoother even if my fps hovers around 260 in Apex. My theory on why the 240hz one, is that its currently "pretty much" the best monitor i can get. Even the prices are the same. This is a very notable difference and it's within reach of all midrange CPUs and GPUs. The colors and viewing angles of the TN panel are abysmal compared to the IPS. Of course are hz and fps connected. 94ms. All in all it is def worth going for, even tho higher and higher refreshrates have diminishing returns. 1440p gives you sharper image and overall better viewing experience. I wouldn’t get less than 240hz because now 144hz will be normal, 240hz will be the best gaming experience and 360hz is if you want to most possible don’t test anything less than 240hz. The biggest help where a 240hz monitor will help you is in flick shots. Sharpness, picture quality and additional area is nice. I would 100 percent take the image quality of the QD OLED over the fps Good luck getting FPS in this game thats over 144. I've tried a bunch and feel like the gains really stop at about 165hz. It takes 4ms between frames at 240hz so at t=4ms, 8ms, 12ms the 240hz monitor has already refreshed. 77ms if you go from 144Hz to 240Hz, and 1. This is my personal opinion of course. I do not know why this is such a tough decision, but after playing a week on 1440p 240hz (AW2721D) and another week on 1080p 360hz (AW2521H), I'm really torn. It will also leave room if you end up going with multiple monitors. Wouldn’t even consider a 170hz monitor without g-sync module. all were noticeable. So the difference between 60 and 75hz (1. Honestly - I didn't feel like it was worth the upgrade. i mostly play fps games like apex and valorant so a higher refresh rate is more ideal than resolution, so i think it is better to just use 1080p 240hz. In 2019, TN has got nothing on the IPS. The we did 120hz vs 144hz got some missed some , then 144hz vs 240hz, there is an improvement in fluidity , and any sort of ghosting or “blur” is 100% gone, movement looks sharp. a_curious_guy_gt. In other words, it draws the image faster than a 120Hz panel, which means less lag and less probability of tearing (in case you play with vsync off). Its priced at 280 dollars with an IPS panel, and great backlight strobing, response times are solid too compared to the competition. Certain setting like can sacrifice a decent amount of fps for a small visual improvement. 240 is nice to have some games are light and will hit that frame rate like competitive games. So I have a 144hz monitor and I have read everywhere that you should cap you fps at the same amount of hz your monitor has because of screen tearing. If that TN panel hits 1ms reliably, it'd be faster than 144hz. Torn between these monitors: BenQ XL2546k 240hz $400. I'm currently on a 1080p 144hz. 144hz to 240hz offers a 2. I would go 240 personally. My personal experience with 240Hz (27GN750) vs. I would definitely go 1440p 144hz! Reply. Simple, if your game is hitting above 60fps-144fps, 144hz and 240hz behave the same (240 tiny smoother). •. If you have a 60 hz monitor you don't see any difference between 60 and 200 fps because the monitor doesn't refresh often enough. but want to see the hype with 1440p and see if its true. I understand that a strong GPU will be needed to run these two monitors in the first place; I already To be honest difference is not much. try to upgrade / tweak for more fps first (lower res, etc. And yes, the higher the frame rate/refresh rate you're using, the higher the polling rate you want ideally. Initially 240hz didn't feel noticeably smoother compared to the 165hz experience on an LG monitor I'd also been trialing the last couple days. Nov 10, 2021 · As shown in the table, the time between each frame drops significantly when you go from 60Hz to 144Hz, reducing it by 9. The higher frame rates are approached asymptotically in terms of visual quality. You’ll notice the extra hertz when moving with a scooped in sniper, or flicking your crosshair. wouldn't recommend it for like a living or anything, but on a desk? looks If you’re going 1440p, I’d suggest 27”. My exact resolution is 1840 x 1150 @ 144 hz. not even on competitive i did not chose 360, i preffer better character sharpness and awareness over 1080@360. The price of the 1440p monitor is still significantly higher even though it only has 144Hz refresh rate, whereas the 1080p monitor has a higher refresh rate of 240Hz. Struggling to justify the need for more Hz here. Although everyone perceives motion and input lag differently, the vast majority of people will likely have a hard time 1440p - 144hz would be ideal or 240 if only competitive like csgo or som like that. Mar 13, 2024 · The price difference between 144Hz and 240Hz models at 1440p resolution is a bit higher. The difference between 165 and 240 will be very small. The best competitive gamers have a reaction time of 120 ms or so, so either one would spit out dozens of frames between a stimulus and any action taken on the part of the player. If you can get a 1440p 240hz go for it but you might not even tell the difference since the leap in input lag is not that dramatic as a 60hz panel to a 120hz panel. The games you play the most literally decide which monitor to go with. 4k 240hz vs 1440p 360hz. The difference between 144hz to 240hz is slightly noticeable. Exactly. bs yz vb pn xk yf wv gs lr mr